From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Thu Sep 7 14:28:50 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E1DBE20608; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 14:28:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asomers@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf0-x232.google.com (mail-lf0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DDF780169; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 14:28:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asomers@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf0-x232.google.com with SMTP id q132so24910367lfe.5; Thu, 07 Sep 2017 07:28:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=JXfy2bTttoWSWELvgCdbmcumDSL5eBa+rRpCqFwU4lI=; b=E/b19D6wQ16iPa2OEDEpPzaDTJ8rHfNXwbcAeNK4yKsD9XHgUYhHl67uAvogEtSBHS OCR9pTw/HckA54kHhG5+PbsCkadFZiOuYV//wHO4NVaIUXFweh4zDV3nX4Njavo81/4M kH1PngQrYC9kyuvrrSxRmoZo6WGklUgcL8LnsMRZEUSTXs6gW+V1yKM2Sv1JqUNeOfh+ BR1qrgNZAR6Ku8Oa5SkDJCigkkejW501f6m0Kzbm75gp46blKScrrO/RYX/2OyRonieV E/Ct8lhXsyEPA0eLT1v8rTSZSxUeQFq1Az//+EaRot4WyuCgGFXzBPfdBCBtqUWyp5YE v9gw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JXfy2bTttoWSWELvgCdbmcumDSL5eBa+rRpCqFwU4lI=; b=InFjO896DSZ/rxHGxr4124ktIh/oj0Zo4lVPaayH3Gw5tUq7R/4p/HFzR0SiAMy/qj RGeoz5yIsTvv1SAo5IPzQ1+6CesH2/4EgKu+Mj/OUwRgmaa+qy9JEFbOXILhj6whe14J DoDaZo2IM8YtvOrjCjznh6/9yfKr+QX0wss9dnJ8c6nPDBd6jzYRjNTcsvX30Ylas07S S4D+mUNQXxKpcjXzI6qhf2YgpClqmbfR0tzwzDghpfzoFEBO5+hMMtMuHvy3vSFGEfqS qbFX1a9ootd9i4lJnBOJL+I1O+umHERx482DkIsqrdKc/zoqd71dF/zdxkYx6Vqzuap7 a/5Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUhj8HLS2Jxe2iqNtSfJMSGBMZMe11XwLZ7mmV2OIv4/H701tzCV sbKs7MdwgyoqT46tma68n9lroIJiBQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QBFVZYBhxZKWs6zUQG210tkv2IHlBhloNlOBWRtE5OBYoZIQK6P7eWPys5oG37kE8zYmvsJlGwOh2ZlgyiD2K4= X-Received: by 10.25.23.95 with SMTP id n92mr957405lfi.95.1504794527501; Thu, 07 Sep 2017 07:28:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: asomers@gmail.com Received: by 10.179.26.6 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 07:28:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Alan Somers Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 08:28:46 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: wRVeuEN4v-HcCsPZNH93TsDbWjA Message-ID: Subject: Re: openbsd 6.0 or 6.1 guest on freebsd-12 (current) host To: Jason Tubnor Cc: tech-lists , "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD CURRENT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 14:28:50 -0000 On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Jason Tubnor wrote: > On 6 September 2017 at 22:15, tech-lists wrote: > >> >> >> Have you encountered anything on openbsd in a bhyve that you've found >> not to work? >> >> > As Thomas mentioned, there is/was a bug with certain CPUs, but this was due > to the strict checking of CPU features that OpenBSD introduced ( > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=149136173520510&w=2). Peter explained > the switch to get around that issue (-w). > > The only other thing is Jumbo frame support, but that is really down to > limits in VirtIO and not really a show stopper and doesn't affect anything > in production for us. > > Enjoy bhyve, it has been a drop in replacement for our individual ESXi > instances and has been bulletproof, which is good as we have hypervisor > hosts over 6 hour drives away! (Oh the uplift from 11.0 to 11.1 was done > remotely without nuking the host). > > Cheers, > > Jason. Do you have a semiautomated way to move bhyve instances between different hosts? Without such a feature, we can't replace all of our ESXi machines. -Alan