From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 19 14:54:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21D23D56 for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 14:54:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Received: from ns1.feral.com (ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E78AC8FC08 for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 14:54:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.135.101] (c-71-202-26-251.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [71.202.26.251]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.feral.com (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q9JErvS8085592 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 07:53:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Message-ID: <5081697F.6000204@feral.com> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 07:53:51 -0700 From: Matthew Jacob Organization: Feral Software User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: removal of share/doc/{papers,psd,smm,usd} in 2 months References: <20121019143617.GF69724@acme.spoerlein.net> <4B498A56-CE3B-4C7F-B5F1-B1054E1E6DC6@exonetric.com> In-Reply-To: <4B498A56-CE3B-4C7F-B5F1-B1054E1E6DC6@exonetric.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1]); Fri, 19 Oct 2012 07:53:57 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matt Jacob List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 14:54:04 -0000 On 10/19/2012 7:45 AM, Mark Blackman wrote: > On 19 Oct 2012, at 15:36, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> those roff sources have been very naughty and will be removed from the >> tree by the end of the year. Most of those papers are severely out of >> date and provide no more use to the system. They can probably also be >> found online using a search engine of your choice. >> >> Should people feel strongly about them, we might be able to move them >> over to the doc repository. > I have looked at them every once in a while and I would move them to > the doc repository under 'legacy' or 'archived'. > > +1