From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 6 17:58:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A650016A434 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 17:58:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nate@root.org) Received: from ylpvm12.prodigy.net (ylpvm12-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.57.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22CE143D46 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 17:58:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nate@root.org) Received: from pimout5-ext.prodigy.net (pimout5-int.prodigy.net [207.115.4.21]) by ylpvm12.prodigy.net (8.12.10 outbound/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j86HwgmY006824 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 13:58:45 -0400 X-ORBL: [67.119.74.222] Received: from [10.0.0.33] (adsl-67-119-74-222.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net [67.119.74.222]) by pimout5-ext.prodigy.net (8.13.4 outbound domainkey aix/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j86HwhsC121530; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 13:58:46 -0400 Message-ID: <431DD8D2.6020006@root.org> Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 10:58:42 -0700 From: Nate Lawson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050723) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott Long References: <200509051602.j85G2Bpo090258@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050905094341.A23343@xorpc.icir.org> <20050905180050.GB41863@cell.sick.ru> <20050905141451.A27290@xorpc.icir.org> <20050906061828.GQ41863@cell.sick.ru> <20050906012755.B34182@xorpc.icir.org> <20050906112608.N51625@fledge.watson.org> <431DC64E.9010903@root.org> <431DCEFB.9030005@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <431DCEFB.9030005@samsco.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Luigi Rizzo , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Gleb Smirnoff , Robert Watson , cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_poll.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 17:58:52 -0000 Scott Long wrote: > Nate Lawson wrote: >> For the case of storage, you actually have a better model since all >> transactions are initiated from the host (as opposed to packet >> arrivals). This gives an easy metric for a dynamic polling threshold >> -- if you have a deep queue of outstanding requests and one completes, >> you should poll a little more than normal. >> > > Except for target mode. Never heard of that before. -- Nate