From owner-freebsd-advocacy Wed Sep 15 16:58:27 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from pop3-3.enteract.com (pop3-3.enteract.com [207.229.143.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D77814C32 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 16:58:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ethan@shell-2.enteract.com) Received: (qmail 36533 invoked from network); 15 Sep 1999 23:58:24 -0000 Received: from shell-2.enteract.com (ethan@207.229.143.41) by pop3-3.enteract.com with SMTP; 15 Sep 1999 23:58:24 -0000 Received: (from ethan@localhost) by shell-2.enteract.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA87178; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 18:58:23 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ethan) Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 18:58:23 -0500 From: Ethan Bakshy To: "James A. Mutter" Cc: Chris Coleman , advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG, netbsd-advocacy@netbsd.org, advocacy@openbsd.org Subject: Re: Daemon News Daily Site Message-ID: <19990915185823.F85083@enteract.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.6i In-Reply-To: ; from James A. Mutter on Wed, Sep 15, 1999 at 07:13:50PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Looks like a slashdotesqe BSD news page. Which is cool and all, I just think the design of the page [asthetically speaking] could be a little bit cleaner. coming from a web designer/geek standpoint. anywhere to talk to these guys working on the site? But I like it- its definatley a big step from what there was before, which is nothing. It works the way it should, and has a clean and direct architecture. -- ethan "We believe (JavaStation) was basically the right approach, but used some of the wrong technology. We've learned that users don't want to just use Java" -Loiacono, Sun Microsystems To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message