From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Sep  9 01:09:34 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id BAA28006
          for ports-outgoing; Tue, 9 Sep 1997 01:09:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (ala-ca32-19.ix.netcom.com [199.35.209.83])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA27991
          for <ports@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 9 Sep 1997 01:09:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.7/8.6.9) id BAA19491; Tue, 9 Sep 1997 01:09:28 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 1997 01:09:28 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199709090809.BAA19491@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: ports@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: <199709090708.AAA18336@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> (asami@cs.berkeley.edu)
Subject: Re: what do you think ... should/could ports move to -> /usr/local/ports ?
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * Date: Tue, 9 Sep 1997 00:08:47 -0700 (PDT)
 * From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)

In case you are wondering where the original mail went, this was me
replying to Andreas' private mail that had "Reply-to: ports" set.

Rest assured, you won't see me reply to his mail ever again.

Satoshi