From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Jun 16 2:45: 2 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from frontier.netnology.com.au (frontier.netnology.com.au [203.33.30.19]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AA1614C8C for ; Wed, 16 Jun 1999 02:44:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from craig@hotmix.com.au) Received: from superbruce (superbruce.netnology.com.au [203.33.30.10]) by frontier.netnology.com.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id SAA11875 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 1999 18:44:29 +0800 From: Craig Beasland Reply-To: To: "'FreeBSD Questions List'" Subject: Sendmail Bits Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 17:52:46 +0800 Message-ID: <01C7F728BCABD211860B00C0261004190490C9@ABERDEEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi there, I have a question regarding sendmail... I have set up virtusertable and it works great, but now I want to make a slight modification. Any mail that passes all the virtusertable users then all local users if it is still not deliverable, I would like it sent to a single mailbox. I have looked through loads of stuff at dejanews, and the answer seems to be LUSER_RELAY, but every time LUSER_RELAY is mentioned, it is also mentioned that you shouldn't use it because it can muck up "working" addresses if you add new local users. Is there another solution? Is this just a warning that can be safely ignored (and then forgotten until the mail stops working ;-) Thanks for any help Cheers craig To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message