From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jun 17 14:27:27 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from web11402.mail.yahoo.com (web11402.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.131.232]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C322737B401 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 14:27:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from raysonlogin@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20010617212721.42453.qmail@web11402.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [128.100.13.59] by web11402.mail.yahoo.com; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 14:27:21 PDT Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 14:27:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Rayson Ho Subject: Re: Article: Network performance by OS To: Kenneth Wayne Culver , Matthew Hagerty Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG But how much tuning is needed? You can download a kernel patch for VM, another kernel patch for FS... I am sure Linux can be even faster on an SMP machine with a Journaling FS (XFS, RFS, JFS, ext3, etc). Rayson --- Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote: > This is not really a "hardcore networking app" but a custom app > written by > the person who did the benchmark. The main reason that FreeBSD came > in > last was mostly because the guy didn't mount his filesystem > correctly. > > On Sat, 16 Jun 2001, Matthew Hagerty wrote: > > > Greetings, > > > > Here is a surprisingly unbiased article comparing OSes running hard > core > > network apps. The results are kind of disturbing, with FreeBSD > (4.2) > > coming in last against Linux (RH), Win2k, and Solaris (Intel). > > > > http://www.sysadminmag.com/articles/2001/0107/0107a/0107a.htm > > > > The tests were performed against the TCP/IP implementation on these > > > platforms with different system calls. File systems tests (EXT2 > for Linux, > > UFS for FreeBSD and Solaris, and NTFS for Windows 2000) were > performed by > > creating writing, and reading 10,000 files in the same directory, > > increasing the file size from 4K to 128K. Tests of various network > > > applications based on number of simultaneous connections, > process-based vs. > > thread-based, and sync vs. async connection handling were also > performed. > > > > Hope it might be helpful to you... > > > > Matthew > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Spot the hottest trends in music, movies, and more. http://buzz.yahoo.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message