From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Aug 16 19: 9:23 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2826037B400 for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 19:09:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from golf.cts.com (golf.cts.com [205.163.23.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA9FF43E72 for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 19:09:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from morgan.davis@hosting.com) Received: from sun.space.lan (cox-vortex [192.168.1.2]) by golf.cts.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7H29Kgc000437; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 19:09:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from morgan.davis@hosting.com) Received: from mars (mars.space.lan [192.168.0.6]) by sun.space.lan (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7H29Kew050589; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 19:09:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from morgan.davis@hosting.com) From: "Morgan Davis" To: "'Brooks Davis'" Cc: Subject: RE: uname reports 4.6-STABLE not 4.6.2-STABLE? Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 19:09:24 -0700 Organization: Hosting.com Message-ID: <000901c24593$1b940630$0600a8c0@space.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 In-Reply-To: <20020816190318.A22458@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1089 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Ah, yes. *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_4 Thanks for the explanation/reminder Brooks. --Morgan > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG [mailto:owner-freebsd- > stable@FreeBSD.ORG] On Behalf Of Brooks Davis > Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 7:03 PM > To: Morgan Davis > Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: uname reports 4.6-STABLE not 4.6.2-STABLE? > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 06:58:49PM -0700, Morgan Davis wrote: > > Is it normal for uname to not report the tertiary version number in the > > STABLE branch? It's been so long since we had a three digit release > > revision I can't recall. > > > > In the event it is normal, is there a way to determine the .2 > > maintenance level? Even /usr/src/UPDATING doesn't seem to have a line > > in there about the 4.6.2 RELEASE date. > > 4.6.2 is a snapshot of RELENG_4_6, the 4.6 security fix branch, not a > snapshot of RELENG_4, the 4.x branch so if you track RELENG_4, you won't > ever run 4.6.2. > > -- Brooks > > -- > Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. > PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message