From owner-freebsd-current Sun Feb 28 14:59:10 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from culverk.student.umd.edu (culverk.student.umd.edu [129.2.164.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D47C15337 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 14:59:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from culverk@wam.umd.edu) Received: from localhost (culverk@localhost) by culverk.student.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA00408; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 17:59:09 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from culverk@wam.umd.edu) X-Authentication-Warning: culverk.student.umd.edu: culverk owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 17:59:08 -0500 (EST) From: Kenneth Wayne Culver X-Sender: culverk@culverk.student.umd.edu To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: Chuck Robey , "David O'Brien" , The Hermit Hacker , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: gcc In-Reply-To: <31170.920242197@zippy.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > A legit concern, but also realize that all of us are talking about > 4.0 here - the new compiler would be an issue we'd have up to a full > year on before the product it's in goes mainstream. If that's not enough > time to work out the compiler issues after switching, I can't imagine > when we WILL have a better time to try and do this then. Progress > entails some pain, and if we're unwilling to suffer any at all then > progress ceases entirely. This is interesting, what makes egcs better than gcc? just a dumb question. I agree with Jordan though: no pain no gain. :-) Kenneth Culver To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message