From owner-freebsd-current Mon Feb 2 15:53:32 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA11981 for current-outgoing; Mon, 2 Feb 1998 15:53:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (genesi.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.136.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA11974 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 1998 15:53:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from doconnor@cain.gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id KAA23384; Tue, 3 Feb 1998 10:22:41 +1030 (CST) Message-Id: <199802022352.KAA23384@cain.gsoft.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: Tom cc: "Daniel O'Connor" , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IJPPP stuff In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 02 Feb 1998 15:47:30 -0800." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 03 Feb 1998 10:22:41 +1030 From: "Daniel O'Connor" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG X-To-Unsubscribe: mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org "unsubscribe current" > > after a certain timeout. > > IMO this behaviour is a bit dubious :) > Not necessarily. A common terminal server brand, running old software > will accept LQR negotiation but won't always respond to LQR requests. So > few implementations actually default to LQR on, or even support LQR this > was never seen as much of problem. Hmm, but the log messages from PPP say the they did not negotiate LQR's. The provider is Telstra, and AFAIK they use Cisco's. --------------------------------------------------------------------- |Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software | |http://www.gsoft.com.au | |The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to| |choose from. -- Andrew Tanenbaum | ---------------------------------------------------------------------