Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 02:01:08 -0600 From: "Janky Jay, III" <jankyj@unfs.us> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: poudriere(8) short circuits my ability to build packages Message-ID: <d83408a1-4f7a-4449-abef-5b0c8f3d0911@unfs.us> In-Reply-To: <78550638a3787fd0897093fdad463a00@bsdforge.com> References: <78550638a3787fd0897093fdad463a00@bsdforge.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Chris, On 4/4/24 01:30AM, Chris wrote: > limitations, or poudriere at all? How can I just build a package. Users > (or Maintainers) aren't forced to use poudriere, are they? Unfortunately, yes. Yes, we are. That or packages (which is lacking due to non-existent build options.) For me, Poudriere has been nothing but a headache with a lot of work to obtain said headache (compared to just using ports.) Three port updates? Poudriere wants to rebuild 210 ports (all with default options, mind you.) When, using portmaster, I can simply update the 3 ports and be done with it. That is, of course, if the ports build outside of Poudriere (some do not.) In this case, I simply mix ports and packages and just deal with it. However, it is unfortunate. Regards, Janky Jay, III
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d83408a1-4f7a-4449-abef-5b0c8f3d0911>