From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Sep 27 19:14:54 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id TAA28082
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 27 Sep 1997 19:14:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA28070
          for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 27 Sep 1997 19:14:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.7/8.6.9) with ESMTP id TAA27017; Sat, 27 Sep 1997 19:13:32 -0700 (PDT)
To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: ee taking up weird cpu amount. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 27 Sep 1997 11:54:02 -0000."
             <199709271154.EAA24656@usr04.primenet.com> 
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 1997 19:13:31 -0700
Message-ID: <27013.875412811@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> This, of course, has to do with ksh's method of backgrounding a
> process.  A process which is in the background is a chikd of init,

Say *what*?  No it's not!  Try again. :-)

>Dealing with the error case is only a requirement of FreeBSD and
>several other "broken" systems.  The only other one that springs to

Dealing with I/O errors on reading from the tty is the responsibilty
of any reasonably well written program.  Is that a genuine Stetson I
see you talking out of there?  Nice hat! ;-)

					Jordan