From owner-cvs-all Wed Apr 18 13: 0:37 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mail.clickarray.com (clickwall.clickarray.com [216.132.92.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD04F37B424; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 13:00:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from vader.clickarray.com (nattedaddress.clickarray.com [10.2.1.199]) by mail.clickarray.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB6B15EF04; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 13:10:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from asami@localhost) by vader.clickarray.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) id f3IK0T542864; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 13:00:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@cs.berkeley.edu) X-Authentication-Warning: vader.clickarray.com: asami set sender to asami@cs.berkeley.edu using -f To: mi@aldan.algebra.com Cc: Maxim Sobolev , Will Andrews , jedgar@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/samba-devel Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/net/samba-devel/files patch-aa patch-af References: <3ADDC746.F2C2E1CE@FreeBSD.org> <200104181733.f3IHX1C36771@misha.privatelabs.com> From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.13.7 - "Awazu") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Date: 18 Apr 2001 13:00:28 -0700 In-Reply-To: <200104181733.f3IHX1C36771@misha.privatelabs.com> (mi@aldan.algebra.com's message of "Wed, 18 Apr 2001 13:33:00 -0400 (EDT)") Message-ID: Lines: 22 User-Agent: T-gnus/6.14.5 (based on Gnus v5.8.7) (revision 06) SEMI/1.13.7 (Awazu) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) Emacs/20.7 (i386--freebsd) MULE/4.0 =?ISO-2022-JP?B?KBskQjJWMWMbKEIp?= Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi guys, The only reason why xemacs was allowed in was because it was just a few minutes late. It also had 39 dependent ports not building that knu-san tried to fix, and that number was going to double if the last minute breakage was allowed to affect the build. knu-san told me he will simply back out the upgrade and commit the minimal change to fix the original 39, so I agreed to delay the build for less than an hour. I do not make any judgments on which port/package is more important than others. The only thing that gets special treatment is if something in the "required" set (i.e., sysinstall provides a separate menu to install it) does not build or has to be disabled due to security holes, since that will make sysinstall fail in very ugly ways. So, please stop this arguing about whether we let in something once or whether gnome is more important than samba, etc., ok? Those are simply not the criteria that I use. -PW To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message