Date: 18 Apr 2001 13:00:28 -0700 From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) To: mi@aldan.algebra.com Cc: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>, Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu>, jedgar@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/samba-devel Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/net/samba-devel/files patch-aa patch-af Message-ID: <yfk4rvmt1ur.fsf@vader.clickarray.com> In-Reply-To: <200104181733.f3IHX1C36771@misha.privatelabs.com> (mi@aldan.algebra.com's message of "Wed, 18 Apr 2001 13:33:00 -0400 (EDT)") References: <3ADDC746.F2C2E1CE@FreeBSD.org> <200104181733.f3IHX1C36771@misha.privatelabs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi guys, The only reason why xemacs was allowed in was because it was just a few minutes late. It also had 39 dependent ports not building that knu-san tried to fix, and that number was going to double if the last minute breakage was allowed to affect the build. knu-san told me he will simply back out the upgrade and commit the minimal change to fix the original 39, so I agreed to delay the build for less than an hour. I do not make any judgments on which port/package is more important than others. The only thing that gets special treatment is if something in the "required" set (i.e., sysinstall provides a separate menu to install it) does not build or has to be disabled due to security holes, since that will make sysinstall fail in very ugly ways. So, please stop this arguing about whether we let in something once or whether gnome is more important than samba, etc., ok? Those are simply not the criteria that I use. -PW To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?yfk4rvmt1ur.fsf>