From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 05:56:02 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB53A16A4BF; Thu, 4 Sep 2003 05:56:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gw.celabo.org (gw.celabo.org [208.42.49.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 620D043FF2; Thu, 4 Sep 2003 05:56:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nectar@celabo.org) Received: from madman.celabo.org (madman.celabo.org [10.0.1.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "madman.celabo.org", Issuer "celabo.org CA" (verified OK)) by gw.celabo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC72F54883; Thu, 4 Sep 2003 07:55:59 -0500 (CDT) Received: by madman.celabo.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 88E2C6D461; Thu, 4 Sep 2003 07:55:58 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 07:55:58 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: "Sergey A. Osokin" Message-ID: <20030904125557.GB21228@madman.celabo.org> References: <200309041253.h84CrSeE098490@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200309041253.h84CrSeE098490@repoman.freebsd.org> X-Url: http://www.celabo.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i-ja.1 cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/databases/postgresql-tcltk Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 12:56:02 -0000 On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 05:53:28AM -0700, Sergey A. Osokin wrote: > osa 2003/09/04 05:53:28 PDT > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > databases/postgresql-tcltk Makefile > Log: > Use another way for PortgreSQL slave ports (make without -C), > because much more people still use old versions of make. > > Notify from: Dan Langille > Submitted by: Palle Girgensohn (maintainer) > PR: 56346 What was wrong with `.include' ? It seems like the new scheme mostly increases the number of fork/execs for every operation. -- Jacques Vidrine . NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal nectar@celabo.org . jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@freebsd.org . nectar@kth.se