From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 04:25:09 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B09416A4BF for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 04:25:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.securesoftware.com (mail.securesoftware.com [206.131.226.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E641A43FF5 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 04:25:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rzigweid@securesoftware.com) Received: from [206.131.226.41] (unknown [206.131.226.41]) by mail.securesoftware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E1017A for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 07:24:25 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v589) In-Reply-To: <20030904225333.GA56800@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030904225333.GA56800@rot13.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <9A46C48A-DF93-11D7-9CC9-00039310484E@securesoftware.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Robert M.Zigweid Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 07:25:07 -0400 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.589) Subject: Re: Automake and Autoconf compatability issue. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 11:25:09 -0000 On Sep 4, 2003, at 6:53 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 02:00:19PM -0400, Robert M.Zigweid wrote: > >> Why is this cross-platform set of tools, being made less compatable >> than the origainal package? > > Because this wonderful cross-platform set of tools need to be munged > so that you can have multiple versions installed simultaneously > (different ports need different versions). > > Kris > This is an incorrect statement. The packages come with scripts that call the appropriate binary (the actual automake script etc). The actual binary is called (for example) automake-1.7, leaving plenty of room for having multiple versions of the tool. Granted, this may be a hack to support their wonderful lack of support for backwards compatability. The mangling in FreeBSD ports seems to me to be a worse hack, however.