From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 30 10:47:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C00D16A4CE; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 10:47:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from alogis.com (firewall2.alogis.com [62.8.223.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EB6443D31; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 10:47:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hk@alogis.com) Received: from alogis.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alogis.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j0UAlW9R031429; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 11:47:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from hk@alogis.com) Received: (from hk@localhost) by alogis.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j0UAlWVe031428; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 11:47:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from hk) Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 11:47:32 +0100 From: Holger Kipp To: Scott Long Message-ID: <20050130104732.GA30800@intserv.int1.b.intern> References: <20050129202425.GA56998@heechee.tobez.org> <41FC75E9.3060601@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41FC75E9.3060601@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: perl@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] perl symlinks in /usr/bin will be gone X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 10:47:35 -0000 On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 10:51:37PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: > Anton Berezin wrote: > > >Unless I hear too many cries "don't do that" (with justification), I > >plan to not create any perl symlinks in /usr/bin in the forthcoming > >upgrade of both lang/perl5.8 (to 5.8.6) and lang/perl5 (to 5.6.2). This > >will ONLY be true for FreeBSD 5.X and FreeBSD CURRENT; the existing > >pollution of /usr/bin will still be performed for older versions of > >FreeBSD, if requested via use.perl script. [...] > I'm fine with this plan for 6-CURRENT. For 5-STABLE, it's a major > user-visible change, and that is something that we promised to avoid > with stable branches. It violates POLA on 5-STABLE, and it will violate POLA on 6-CURRENT, especially as most perl programmers assume /usr/bin/perl to be the correct path. We had enough good arguments against this change already, so imho the correct thing to do is do just what Kris asked for: remove the _dangling_ symlinks. Regards, Holger Kipp