From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 15 17:58:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5CB16A41F; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 17:58:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flz@xbsd.org) Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [216.136.204.119]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92B2743D83; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 17:58:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flz@xbsd.org) Received: from localhost (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A46565850D; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 17:55:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flz@xbsd.org) From: Florent Thoumie To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 18:55:47 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1178051.CiHtI2HJhr"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200601151855.53000.flz@xbsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, ale@freebsd.org Subject: Re: All php ports maintained by Ale missing long descriptions X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 17:58:16 -0000 --nextPart1178051.CiHtI2HJhr Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 15 January 2006 18:42, fbsd_user wrote: > The answer to your smart ass question is YES. > That long description field is there for a purpose. > Loading it with bull shit does not make the port collection any more > easy to use. > It is not the readers job to guess what the port does. > So if you don't have any value to add to this post please keep your > silly thoughts to your self. > You only make your self look like a fool and waste peoples time. First, you didn't need to send this to -ports. Then, you could have been a bit more polite. Finally, as a long time FreeBSD user and smart person, you could have used the usual way to report such a problem using send-pr or its web front-end. =2D-=20 =46lorent Thoumie flz@FreeBSD.org =46reeBSD Committer --nextPart1178051.CiHtI2HJhr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDyoyoMxEkbVFH3PQRApnFAJ4/boV2mX6RDtQAlnGJ7WFhY1/f6ACdF2E/ Pae7Pb6XGXufYxqqs0cs0+8= =4NMt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1178051.CiHtI2HJhr--