From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 3 21:35:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BD121065673 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 21:35:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stefan.lambrev@moneybookers.com) Received: from sfgw1.moneybookers.com (sfgw1.moneybookers.com [195.34.111.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5042C8FC1A for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 21:35:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sfgw1.moneybookers.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sfgw1.moneybookers.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21AA1B40C39; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 23:15:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from maylo.moneybookers.com (maylo.dev.moneybookers.net [192.168.3.20]) by sfgw1.moneybookers.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CE41B40C35; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 23:15:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.1.1.3] (unknown [10.46.0.25]) by maylo.moneybookers.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DF5537BF81B; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 23:15:18 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Stefan Lambrev In-Reply-To: <4C582DEB.1000105@netfence.it> Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 00:15:18 +0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <4C582DEB.1000105@netfence.it> To: Andrea Venturoli X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.1 at gw1.sof.moneybookers.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on gw1.sof.moneybookers.net Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CARP over LAGG X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2010 21:35:20 -0000 Hello, This should be possible. I do have 7.2 systems which have lagg0 on = em0/em1 VLANs over lagg0 and carp over those VLANs. So I guess carp over lagg0 = should no be a problem. lagg0: flags=3D8943 = metric 0 mtu 1500 = options=3D19b ether 00:30:48:c8:2f:50 media: Ethernet autoselect status: active laggproto lacp laggport: em1 flags=3D1c laggport: em0 flags=3D1c vlan4: flags=3D8943 = metric 0 mtu 1500 options=3D3 ether 00:30:48:c8:2f:50 inet 10.62.4.253 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.62.4.255 media: Ethernet autoselect status: active vlan: 4 parent interface: lagg0 carp4: flags=3D49 metric 0 mtu 1500 inet 10.62.4.1 netmask 0xffffff00=20 carp: MASTER vhid 4 advbase 1 advskew 0 On Aug 3, 2010, at 5:55 PM, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Hello. >=20 > On a couple of 7.2 systems, I've got some carp interfaces build upon a = physical interface (em0 or igb0) and everything works fine. >=20 > On both box I've tried aggregating two interfaces (resp. em0+em1 and = igb0+igb1) into a lagg0 interface, using LACP. > However, in this case CARP will stop working as all carp devices which = work over lagg0 will stay in INIT state. >=20 > Is this a bug? > Is "carp over lagg" possible at all? >=20 > bye & Thanks > av. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Best Wishes, Stefan Lambrev ICQ# 24134177