From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 4 15:07:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F23D3106568B; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 15:07:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC70B8FC1F; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 15:07:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [65.122.17.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5080546B2E; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:07:55 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 15:07:55 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Attilio Rao In-Reply-To: <200911040132.nA41WxtQ012750@svn.freebsd.org> Message-ID: References: <200911040132.nA41WxtQ012750@svn.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r198868 - in head/sys: amd64/amd64 i386/i386 X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:07:56 -0000 On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Attilio Rao wrote: > + if (CPUID_TO_FAMILY(cpu_id) == 0xf && CPUID_TO_MODEL(cpu_id) >= 0x20 && > + CPUID_TO_MODEL(cpu_id) <= 0x3f) { > + printf("WARNING: This architecture revision has known SMP " > + "hardware bugs which may cause random instability\n"); > + printf("WARNING: For details see: " > + "http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11305\n"); I think the warning is a good idea, but I don't think we should include the URL. We have no control over where it points or what information it will contain in the future. Is there a hardware vendor errata number/document that we can point at instead, or alternatively, can we just leave it with the first warning line? Robert