From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 17 08:00:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 817591065677 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 08:00:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dieterich.joh@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f167.google.com (mail-fx0-f167.google.com [209.85.220.167]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5B5F8FC1B for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 08:00:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dieterich.joh@googlemail.com) Received: by fxm11 with SMTP id 11so775399fxm.43 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 01:00:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=C7iOPgErszkX0WKBLGUP9qFnDXSeHvljnyyPkG1sGjY=; b=wTAYKQkP3QekJYdurIPHsF7kjQ+1slFQ5qB7VmIh3OxBo8KtkD7OSZYgiGb8QG989Q y2BlqUsC10Fra76Xn0kklCPYPNfpgwHuI39SlJOOL2HP9Ofv/QbTurzvWSGFTuk0W7GV ypnMhzR5uWZALOAqJnn55MOOLqD2+/FbMj2OU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=bhcRqKFr0Mgvaum2GNOrfjxuc3vUHT+BYcJn5jJfv98SChERFk+IyuC9PWqMcuK2TF o6+XGYHItwzO6B+6MDN2TiCwdHi47kJmMTMpmo1159uzk6tGxz/PmNvoMIp0tCHV02P4 /fz1b2wekF/ezC5bezcKYGL+PEcqjphcMrN8Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.102.15 with SMTP id e15mr1984476bko.196.1239953506792; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:31:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200904170836.36239.mel.flynn+fbsd.current@mailing.thruhere.net> References: <200904170836.36239.mel.flynn+fbsd.current@mailing.thruhere.net> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:31:46 +0200 Message-ID: <542798610904170031w44e51957gd342eadf747a4e97@mail.gmail.com> From: Johannes Dieterich To: Mel Flynn X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:47:53 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Proper procedure to update hal on -current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 08:00:13 -0000 Hi Mel, On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Mel Flynn < mel.flynn+fbsd.current@mailing.thruhere.net > wrote: > Hi, > > Given: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2009-March/004871.html > > and the fact that I've got devel/libusb deps forced on me (x11/kdebase4- > workspace for example), what would be the proper procedure to upgrade HAL. > Right now I'm using a +IGNOREME with portmaster, but I'm sure this will > break > stuff in the not so far future. > > Do I need to temporarily uninstall devel/libusb (it doesn't build now > anyway, > but maybe upgrading to today's current will fix that) then reinstall it? My procedure was to deinstall devel/libusb, then I also encountered the same kind of mising dependencies as you do but for me a pkgdb -F afterwards would fix them. Then hal would also build for me. :-) See the procedure in ports/UPDATING, entry 20090309. Hope this helps, Johannes > > > Any chance some BROKEN vars can be set based on FreeBSD_Version? > -- > Mel >