From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 22 23:50:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A330D1065674 for ; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 23:50:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90CD18FC28 for ; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 23:50:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mBMNo3IT039267 for ; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 23:50:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id mBMNo3D7039264; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 23:50:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 23:50:03 GMT Message-Id: <200812222350.mBMNo3D7039264@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: "Garrett Cooper" Cc: Subject: Re: bin/129814: [patch] support of per script nice(1) value in periodic.conf(5) X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Garrett Cooper List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 23:50:03 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/129814; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Garrett Cooper" To: "Artem Naluzhnyy" Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/129814: [patch] support of per script nice(1) value in periodic.conf(5) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:44:22 -0800 The only issue with this is that: if [ -n "${_nice}" ] and: elif [ -n "${default_nice}" ] don't check for valid number values. I'm not sure if we'd want to throw in that logic or not (or if there's something else in our rc-scripts that automatically checks for numbers in range)... I'd ask (quickly) on hackers@ to see if the change makes sense for a more widespread review. Cheers, -Garrett