From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 4 14:06:51 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18D6537B401 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 14:06:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gw.celabo.org (gw.celabo.org [208.42.49.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5077C43F93 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 14:06:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nectar@celabo.org) Received: from madman.celabo.org (madman.celabo.org [10.0.1.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "madman.celabo.org", Issuer "celabo.org CA" (verified OK)) by gw.celabo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3C065482B; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 16:06:49 -0500 (CDT) Received: by madman.celabo.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 74A9D6D455; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 16:06:49 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 16:06:49 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Benjamin Lewis Message-ID: <20030804210649.GC10339@madman.celabo.org> Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , Benjamin Lewis , freebsd-security@freebsd.org References: <200308040004.h7404VVL030671@freefall.freebsd.org> <1060018927.21860.12.camel@cassandra.itsp.purdue.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1060018927.21860.12.camel@cassandra.itsp.purdue.edu> X-Url: http://www.celabo.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i-ja.1 cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:08.realpath X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2003 21:06:51 -0000 On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 12:42:07PM -0500, Benjamin Lewis wrote: > Is it just me or is the patch referenced above wrong? I followed the > instructions above but the patch failed: > > ##### snip ###### > # cd /usr/src-all/current/src # Where my "/usr/src" lives -CURRENT is unaffected. The patch does not apply to -CURRENT. [...] > I wasn't really surprised that it failed since it looks like it should > apply to crypto/openssh/openbsd-compat/realpath.c rather than > lib/libc/stdlib/realpath.c. I assume (from the CVS logs) that cvsup > has taken care of the libc version for me. Yes, sometime after March 29 of this year. > Does the openssh file need to be patched too? No, it is not used. Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine . NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal nectar@celabo.org . jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@freebsd.org . nectar@kth.se