From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Oct 10 16:09:03 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA23552 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 10 Oct 1996 16:09:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from synwork.com (root@synwork.com [199.3.234.4]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA23532 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 1996 16:08:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (flaq@localhost) by synwork.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id SAA10276 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 1996 18:07:47 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 10 Oct 1996 18:07:47 -0500 (CDT) From: SysAdmin To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Mutiple Subnets Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I have two subnets...204.120.255.16/240 and 207.43.59.16/240 I am having trouble assigning both subnets to one interface. I have a PPP link and user ppp creates my default route for me when it connects. For the time being, I have added a second NIC and tied the two together with coax. This machine is about to be tied into a 10Base-T network and I won't be able to link the two cards via coax anymore and I don't want to have to use two ports on a hub if I can avoid it. Any ideas? Mike ~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~ Syn-Work Media, Inc. | WWW Development & Hosting | Life Safety http://www.synwork.com | Systems Integration | CCTV mike@synwork.com | Voice/Data/Fiber | Access Control Flaq on IRC | Dukane Distributor | BICSI/RCDD :|:|:|: Powered By FreeBSD :|:|:|: Turning PC's Into Workstations ~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~