From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 17 11:24:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0565616A4CE for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:24:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 261B243D48 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:24:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226])j0HBOegf028426 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 13:24:40 +0200 Received: by orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (Postfix, from userid 1001) id EE3C42A431; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 13:24:39 +0200 (EET) Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 13:24:39 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050117112439.GA2425@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> References: <200501171040.j0HAeSqo095711@freefall.freebsd.org> <20050117104141.GD91948@voodoo.oberon.net> <20050117105002.GC774@straylight.m.ringlet.net> <20050117105914.GB92983@voodoo.oberon.net> <20050117111222.GE774@straylight.m.ringlet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050117111222.GE774@straylight.m.ringlet.net> Subject: Re: docs/76324: [patch] '[P|p]orts collection' -> 'Ports Collection' in Handbook X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:24:43 -0000 On 2005-01-17 13:12, Peter Pentchev wrote: >On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 11:59:14AM +0100, Kirill Ponomarew wrote: >> Russian translators can just ignore such entities for plural form >> and use it only for singular form eg. > > Even for singular, it won't work - in my example, the usage was not > in the plural, it was the singular form in the... erm.. accusative > (vinitel'nij padezh), right? :) > > And if the entity should be ignored for some cases (arguably, for > *most* cases), then what is the sense of having it in the first > place? The way I see it, the main reason for this PR was that the > capitalization was inconsistent, and IMHO the entity would only be > useful if it were possible to use it in *all* cases so that there is > no way to miscapitalize 'the Ports Collection'. True. If there is no good way to make this happen, we can probably commit the patch "as is".