From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 9 20:39:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7399D16A41C for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 20:39:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail1.fluidhosting.com (mail1.fluidhosting.com [66.150.201.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DC62043D53 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 20:39:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 84089 invoked by uid 399); 9 Jun 2005 20:39:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.0.35.182?) (dougb@dougbarton.net@192.0.35.182) by mail1.fluidhosting.com with SMTP; 9 Jun 2005 20:39:55 -0000 Message-ID: <42A8A91B.8000402@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 13:39:55 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brooks Davis References: <20050607001447.GG37208@linwhf.opal.com> <20050607003142.GD10526@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <20050607033536.GH37208@linwhf.opal.com> <20050607160855.GO37208@linwhf.opal.com> <20050607173741.GI11758@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <20050607191109.GU37208@linwhf.opal.com> <20050608233802.GA29707@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <20050609003459.GK37208@linwhf.opal.com> <20050609050517.GA28710@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <42A89CD7.1080404@FreeBSD.org> <20050609201017.GA10248@odin.ac.hmc.edu> In-Reply-To: <20050609201017.GA10248@odin.ac.hmc.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org, "J.R. Oldroyd" Subject: Re: Use of rcorder for local rc.d/*.sh scripts X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 20:39:57 -0000 Glad to hear that we're more or less in agreement ... Brooks Davis wrote: > One thing to worry about is that this does actually require a flagday. > Currently, the RC_ORDER bsd.port.mk variable allows scripts to be > included in rcorder by installing them directly in /etc/rc.d. Any thing > that used the new flag and moved back to /usr/local/etc/rc.d would stop > working on 5.x in this case. I suppose we could modify the RC_ORDER > support to install the files in /usr/local/etc/rc.d on systems with the > rc changes. That would require a couple of port build runs though. Agreed, we need to coordinate this with the ports folks carefully, but I'm less concerned about that because the ports freeze for 6-release won't be for a long time. The freeze/slushie for the base is tomorrow. :) I sent a note to re@ saying that this change was coming, so hopefully they can cut us a little slack. But it sounds like we agree on the big picture stuff, if we can get some patches out tonight for broader review (say on -current and -ports), then I would feel comfortable getting the code in the base tomorrow before the freeze, then refining it in the next couple months. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection