From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 3 08:48:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FE8716A420 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 08:48:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: from corpmail.itlegion.ru (corpmail.itlegion.ru [84.21.226.211]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D27343D46 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 08:48:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: (qmail 2179 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2006 11:49:25 +0300 Received: from unknown (HELO Artem) (192.168.0.12) by 84.21.226.211 with SMTP; 3 Feb 2006 11:49:25 +0300 X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web [version: 4.33, engine: 4.33.0.10250, virus records: 101764, updated: 2.01.2006] Message-ID: <009601c6289e$40e6f720$0c00a8c0@Artem> From: "Artem Kuchin" To: "Gleb Smirnoff" References: <20060201033249.U562@10.0.0.1> <20060201123428.GD97785@e-Gitt.NET><007401c62842$ecef0dc0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20060203081851.GK60276@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 11:37:32 +0300 Organization: IT Legion MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="koi8-r"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Strange number of mbufs X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 08:48:13 -0000 Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 12:52:09AM +0300, Artem Kuchin wrote: >> Running 5.4-CURRENT. Web server. About 150 virtual servers. >> >> %netstat -m >> >> 4294481198 mbufs in use >> What does this mean? Do i really have 4294481198 mbufs in use? >> How is this possible? > > This is fixed in 6.0-RELEASE. In 5.x the true values can be obtained > via 'vmstat -z'. Which number from output of vmstat -z indicates mbufs? I don't see it there. Artem