Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 08:27:55 +0400 From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7cher@yandex.ru> To: =?UTF-8?B?U8O4cmVuIFNjaG1pZHQ=?= <sos@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@FreeBSD.ORG>, kib@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Request for testing: ata(4) MFC Message-ID: <48F2CE4B.7030000@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <A6F33AAB-E9B1-406A-A9CA-119B1B2A45DA@FreeBSD.ORG> References: <676151223134689@webmail38.yandex.ru> <20081005004808.GA70137@icarus.home.lan> <48E99C18.6070602@yandex.ru> <20081006051211.GA10542@icarus.home.lan> <20081010115855.GA31707@icarus.home.lan> <A6F33AAB-E9B1-406A-A9CA-119B1B2A45DA@FreeBSD.ORG>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Søren Schmidt wrote: > I'm not sure how far this has gone into 7 yet, but it would be a "real > cool thing"(tm) to have the latest ATA module work back into 7.1 as > well. Its a no brainer actually with no functional changes other than > the possibility to load chipset specific code as modules. > I know that a few HW vendors out there would *LOVE* this so they could > make modules for their HW to support FreeBSD on new fancy HW, mind you > that might be binary modules but still better than no support at all. > That would also offload the work on yours truely to concentrate on new > functionality etc instead of hunting new HW support all the time. Do you mean that it will be not bad if i'll update patch? :) -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48F2CE4B.7030000>