Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 25 Aug 2004 11:08:21 +1000
From:      August Simonelli <augusts@gmail.com>
To:        Nathan Kinkade <nkinkade@ub.edu.bz>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: uname -v shows no difference after buildkernel and installkernel etc
Message-ID:  <46fa40c10408241808291c7a39@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040824230642.GR3767@gentoo-npk.bmp.ub>
References:  <46fa40c104082403205419fd65@mail.gmail.com> <20040824143236.GM3767@gentoo-npk.bmp.ub> <46fa40c104082415322575cdc1@mail.gmail.com> <20040824230642.GR3767@gentoo-npk.bmp.ub>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> 
> I apologize, when you said:
> 
> "... did a custom kernel (placing in /root/kernels ..."
> 
> I took it too literally, thinking that for some odd reason you had put
> the actual built (binary) kernel into /root/kernels and were symlinking
> from /boot/kernel to that directory, as opposed to simply putting the
> kernel config file there.  However, is it just a typing mistake that you
> say you link to MYKERNEL, but you say the actual links points to

Nah, just me being sloppy in my syntax; I got the names right
(luckily) during the actual build (or did i ... interesting ...).

> MYCUSTOM?  Also, what does an `ls -l /boot/kernel/kernel` reveal?  Does
> the modification time coincide with the time you actually built your
> custom kernel?

94214 -r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  5940286 Feb 24  2004 /boot/kernel/kernel

So it's the old one ... now, this is good, because on my other test
system the kernel date is correct and uname -v is correct ... so, i've
done something wrong and am gonna try it again ... i'm doing it at
work and probably too distracted by my annoying users! :-)

thanks for you help ... wish me luck on my second attempt!

august



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46fa40c10408241808291c7a39>