Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 27 Dec 2008 09:35:19 -0500
From:      "Alexandre \"Sunny\" Kovalenko" <gaijin.k@gmail.com>
To:        Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>
Cc:        acpi <acpi@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Problem on AMD64
Message-ID:  <1230388519.1270.1.camel@RabbitsDen>
In-Reply-To: <20081227160941.I29108@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
References:  <20081221233822.7E92545020@ptavv.es.net> <49500088.2080609@bigfoot.com> <7d6fde3d0812221315s4d03e15dw4b84679b98a6308f@mail.gmail.com> <49534F10.7040305@bigfoot.com> <7d6fde3d0812261912r1d5abd6cic1513f11cc59f1c5@mail.gmail.com> <20081227160941.I29108@sola.nimnet.asn.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 2008-12-27 at 17:13 +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Dec 2008, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>  > On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 1:14 AM, David van Kuijk <dynasore@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>  [..]
>  > >> Look into the following sysctls:
>  > >>
>  > >> hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest
>  > >> hw.acpi.cpu.cx_highest
>  > >>
>  > >
>  > > I tried to find out what I can do with those sysctls.
>  > > hw.acpi.cpu.cx_highest is not available on my system.
> 
> I don't think it exists; C1 state is always available AFAIK.
> 
>  > > hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest is available and can be set. Are you suggesting I
>  > > should set it to C2 or C3???
> 
> Give it a try.  Setting it to C3 won't hurt, whether it's used or not.  
Actually it just might (hurt that is). See below for the discussion.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=0+2482
+/usr/local/www/db/text/2008/freebsd-acpi/20081109.freebsd-acpi


-- 
Alexandre "Sunny" Kovalenko (Олександр Коваленко)




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1230388519.1270.1.camel>