From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 30 08:30:22 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A41D616A4CE; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 08:30:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EE9D43D39; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 08:30:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au) Received: from gamplex.bde.org (katana.zip.com.au [61.8.7.246]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3p2/8.8.7) with ESMTP id DAA04015; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 03:30:13 +1100 Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 03:30:13 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@gamplex.bde.org To: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20031231032019.G1268@gamplex.bde.org> References: <200312271354.hBRDs3CN092828@repoman.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: Bruce Evans cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/fsck fsutil.h X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 16:30:22 -0000 On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Dag-Erling [iso-8859-1] Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > Bruce Evans writes: > > Declare perror(). We define and use a home made version of perror(3) > > that can't simply be removed (although it has the same interface as > > perror(3)) since it is very different (it prints on stdout, doesn't > > always print the program name, and sometimes exits). Declare it to > > get a reminder of this brokenness when WARNS is increased enough. > > Why not just rename it to not_perror()? Because it should be fixed better. fsck_ffs gets by without any perror() function, and fsck_ffs's other error reporting functions are subtly different. I haven't decided whether fsck_ffs should be more like fsck_msdosfs or vice versa. Bruce