From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Mar 20 11:17:51 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id LAA03484 for current-outgoing; Mon, 20 Mar 1995 11:17:51 -0800
Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA03478 for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 20 Mar 1995 11:17:50 -0800
Received: (from phk@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id LAA27659; Mon, 20 Mar 1995 11:14:29 -0800
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com>
Message-Id: <199503201914.LAA27659@ref.tfs.com>
Subject: Re: /etc/named.boot or /etc/namedb/named.boot?
To: wollman@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu (Garrett Wollman)
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 1995 11:14:29 -0800 (PST)
Cc: ache@astral.msk.su, current@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <9503201851.AA27463@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> from "Garrett Wollman" at Mar 20, 95 01:51:08 pm
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 594       
Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> <<On Mon, 20 Mar 1995 20:56:43 +0300, "Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage" <ache@astral.msk.su> said:
> 
> > My named start to fail due to recent /etc/rc changes:
> 
> You should have read the rc files before you installed new ones.
> 
> The place where we install the default files is /etc/namedb, so for
> most users that is the correct location.
> 
> This will look very different later today.

Incl, man pages ?

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@login.dknet.dk> -- TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
'All relevant people are pertinent' && 'All rude people are impertinent'
=> 'no rude people are relevant'