From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Jul 12 1:14:21 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from blues.ghis.net (pppc1-80.eisa.net.au [203.166.251.80]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83F8E14ECC; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 01:14:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jim@blues.ghis.net) Received: (from jim@localhost) by blues.ghis.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA55355; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 18:12:50 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from jim) Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 18:12:49 +1000 From: Jim Mock To: "David O'Brien" Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: xchat & xchat-devel? Message-ID: <19990712181249.A55317@blues.ghis.net> Reply-To: jim@blues.ghis.net References: <19990712132238.A36959@blues.ghis.net> <19990712010357.A57377@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/0.96.3i In-Reply-To: <19990712010357.A57377@dragon.nuxi.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 12 Jul 1999 at 01:03:57 -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > I'm working on updating the xchat port to the latest version (I'm > > the maintainer), but it (as the current port) are both development > > versions (1.1.0 is the current port, 1.1.2 is the upgrade I'm > > about to diff). There's also a 'stable' version of xchat which is > > 1.0. > > *THREE* different ports for an *IRC* client?!? I think that is > excessive. Unless xchat is very popular and the functionality is > that much different in the 1.1.2 version, a single port for this > will do. No, there would only be two.. xchat, and xchat-devel. -- - Jim Mock - jim@blues.ghis.net - systems administrator - ghis.NET - - work: http://www.ghis.net/ - personal: http://www.ghis.net/~jim/ - - FreeBSD 'zine: http://www.freebsdzine.org/ - jim@freebsdzine.org - - FreeBSD: http://advocacy.freebsd.org/ - jim@advocacy.FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message