From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jun  5 01:36:34 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 778E316A41C
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sun,  5 Jun 2005 01:36:34 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from matt@gsicomp.on.ca)
Received: from skippyii.compar.com (compar.com [216.208.38.130])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A1D043D48
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sun,  5 Jun 2005 01:36:33 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from matt@gsicomp.on.ca)
Received: from hermes (CPE00062566c7bb-CM000039c69a66.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com
	[69.193.82.185])
	by skippyii.compar.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j551lMIF033303;
	Sat, 4 Jun 2005 21:47:23 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from matt@gsicomp.on.ca)
Message-ID: <000701c5696f$0dee3b10$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca>
From: "Matt Emmerton" <matt@gsicomp.on.ca>
To: "Martin" <nakal@nurfuerspam.de>, <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
References: <42A242D1.4000002@nurfuerspam.de>
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 21:36:53 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
Cc: 
Subject: Re: Optimizing libc/string for amd64(?)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2005 01:36:34 -0000

> Hello,
>
> I ran nbench on different workstations and noticed that
> amd64-platform is really bad when doing "STRINGSORT".
>
> Sempron 2200+ (i386)  : 88 iterations/second
> Athlon64 3000+ (amd64): 32.15 iterations/second
>
> I looked inside nbench and it seems to call memmove
> very often. This is OK, in my opinion, so I investigated
> further.
>
> I've just looked inside libc how memmove/memcpy is
> handled there. The function is inside bcopy.c.
> I noticed that the "word" which is used for copying
> has the size of "int".
>
> Wouldn't it be better to set it to "typedef long word"?
> OpenBSD is using "long" there, for example, as I noticed
> later.
>
> I don't have amd64 at home, so I cannot really test
> everything out. Can someone of you take a look at the
> code in libc/string? There are various places that are
> using "int" instead of "long", e.g. also in memset-code.

It would probably be better to use int64_t and int32_t instead of long/int,
in order to make the intention more obvious.

--
Matt Emmerton