Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 14:00:12 -0400 From: <scratch65535@att.net> To: freebsd-ports <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Jive prejudices Message-ID: <acup0clb6r1j3ekl8hg510llbmmpive1eo@4ax.com> In-Reply-To: <201610231341.u9NDfKpp008090@alpd679.prodigy.net> References: <20161022181202.F36710-100000@main.put.com> <201610231341.u9NDfKpp008090@alpd679.prodigy.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
For policy, I'd suggest the creation of a flag "Socially deprecated" that would leave it in the tree but clue people up that there's potentially something unsavory about it. On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 06:41:10 -0700 (PDT), Roger Marquis <marquis@roble.com> wrote: >Louis Epstein wrote: >> You really need to have a hands-off policy on what software people use. > >The meaning of this is unclear as anyone can still compile jive on their >own outside of the ports tree. WRT ports, they should be subject to the >same policies as base. > >The meta questions here are: A) does FreeBSD have a policy restricting >software that promotes hatred, discrimination or violence (IMO it >should) and, if so B) does jive violate that policy. > >Before we can have any substantive discussion of a particular port we >should have consensus on policy. > >Roger >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?acup0clb6r1j3ekl8hg510llbmmpive1eo>