From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 23 18:02:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC10C1E7E7 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:02:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scratch65535@att.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF2E6C15 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:02:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scratch65535@att.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CE7E5C1E7E4; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:02:02 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE227C1E7E3 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:02:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scratch65535@att.net) Received: from nm1-vm6.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm1-vm6.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [216.39.63.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A69D0C14 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:02:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scratch65535@att.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=att.net; s=s1024; t=1477245609; bh=fwoTE+aPZ6RHIHFk2WtPVZlf5eMgq/K8rRk5ltiBMPo=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=f4IKfY2FLLuRcRRhELvXU8OPrIFr1GVAwHFAKGS/7y+opF/1kD4Cb9O0sbnNf6KOc55EKsX0vkswqyKiUDVo1+SLWEytve8bGuaA58NNoCBgUK5L03E3PKfMIW/UBJZav/5JrPrDD6v4B9e6SWQBeyEN2yzhuKmhGl7LD6DobHc= Received: from [216.39.60.166] by nm1.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Oct 2016 18:00:09 -0000 Received: from [67.195.22.118] by tm2.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Oct 2016 18:00:09 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp113.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Oct 2016 18:00:09 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 353954.9706.bm@smtp113.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: ClN3Th8VM1nmI8Vv0Y0HyrcuonJonHcqLsSL1GGe9OFkdtQ ZZ6zJdb63FS5MrUwHX48lwoSyne8pIy4aB_q4f3VW.58D_Y6VD4JYBAQTqCk CinRvZUUoFUxd5ZcUWLYoc7rlZLwkmKKx6AfdnnWXgWEZpiNCt0E8eRJhh2M phwgRjsu4iQSVdB96BxPK3LYQu4jw.yTGpwtsPpnndrGpgfiNmi.5sWcWuf3 CZvmEKJKNnGGbr8FGLD84EyFL_kdqBrHK0a03Hy0N0.VZq_W8H6rBg6GjPGu EHh.iNbv_g0w.2klbsHLcx50XE3O9LFeqRMJ6kI8v0M68nL8dhPTBAkoqnoi Z5sDAExLQ_eMXOJ7pQCgdWgEDDkq.uOkxxS5Km3fcGOcx5LC.nvAwR8OWeKZ e2TzXhjDA6PlrMszvS8rHci0MhUTl9V1K28BiuxPMB1z6RzDNrdeaFuc5944 X_V5ou7UL3ePLoHGGlDOSA0QiP4DhwNpPdSoSmIgZcGIV6II97iCBLq2h8H7 JZQEAne7C63QOXydNnFh3Y_LdRvrSiVTQdxGO_Ts0yzr08mxJyZpBB.HNQ2Q F X-Yahoo-SMTP: pPvqnOaswBBbYZLVYFzvU7GaowLcbNioPp.aF8KvOjZk From: To: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: Jive prejudices Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 14:00:12 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20161022181202.F36710-100000@main.put.com> <201610231341.u9NDfKpp008090@alpd679.prodigy.net> In-Reply-To: <201610231341.u9NDfKpp008090@alpd679.prodigy.net> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:02:03 -0000 For policy, I'd suggest the creation of a flag "Socially deprecated" that would leave it in the tree but clue people up that there's potentially something unsavory about it. On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 06:41:10 -0700 (PDT), Roger Marquis wrote: >Louis Epstein wrote: >> You really need to have a hands-off policy on what software people use. > >The meaning of this is unclear as anyone can still compile jive on their >own outside of the ports tree. WRT ports, they should be subject to the >same policies as base. > >The meta questions here are: A) does FreeBSD have a policy restricting >software that promotes hatred, discrimination or violence (IMO it >should) and, if so B) does jive violate that policy. > >Before we can have any substantive discussion of a particular port we >should have consensus on policy. > >Roger >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"