From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 14 21:51:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1DE6106566B; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 21:51:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wxs@atarininja.org) Received: from syn.atarininja.org (syn.csh.rit.edu [129.21.49.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7C6C8FC08; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 21:51:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by syn.atarininja.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id CB5B45C3C; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:51:17 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:51:17 -0400 From: Wesley Shields To: Stanislav Sedov Message-ID: <20101014215117.GB34544@atarininja.org> References: <201010122319.o9CNJD1A046613@repoman.freebsd.org> <20101014131456.4d49bd3d.stas@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101014131456.4d49bd3d.stas@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Steve Wills , cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/rubygem-pkg-config pkg-descr X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 21:51:18 -0000 On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 01:14:56PM -0700, Stanislav Sedov wrote: > On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 23:19:13 +0000 (UTC) > Steve Wills mentioned: > > > swills 2010-10-12 23:19:13 UTC > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > Modified files: > > devel/rubygem-pkg-config pkg-descr > > Log: > > - Fix WWW > > > > Approved by: wxs (co-mentor) > ^^^^^^^^^ > > This should say "mentor". I've tried to stay out of the other thread involving this, but I feel like I should speak up now. Who approved this commit is quite clear. If I'm a single mentor or have agreed to co-mentor someone is not relevant to the point that line is trying to make. Some latitude with these kinds of trivial things is better than a draconian approach to what is and is not allowed in commit messages. In all honesty, your insistence on not using 'co-mentor' is the first I've ever heard of it. I realize that doesn't make it right, but I think my point that this is a silly debate still stands. -- WXS