Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 19:08:32 +0200 From: Matthias Buelow <mkb@incubus.de> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance of 4.x vs 5.x (Re: Lifetime of FreeBSD branches) Message-ID: <4294B110.6040102@incubus.de> In-Reply-To: <4294AB75.9080908@incubus.de> References: <20050524221454.GA56421@xor.obsecurity.org> <4293F4D9.90204@incubus.de> <84dead7205052420503fded0e9@mail.gmail.com> <4293FD27.90500@incubus.de> <20050525042706.GA60021@xor.obsecurity.org> <4294054C.9080207@incubus.de> <20050525050943.GA64320@xor.obsecurity.org> <42940A81.1030801@incubus.de> <20050525052214.GA76339@xor.obsecurity.org> <42940C87.5000705@incubus.de> <20050525053054.GA76491@xor.obsecurity.org> <4294AB75.9080908@incubus.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> somehow? Maybe I should try and see if the problem persists with the > ULE scheduler? No difference with ULE, with the default parameters: kern.sched.name: ule kern.sched.slice_min: 10 kern.sched.slice_max: 142 kern.sched.preemption: 1 mkb.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4294B110.6040102>