Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 18:38:35 +0100 From: Taceant Omnes <taceant@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions List <questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: rationale for default ZFS datasets Message-ID: <CAKkGsY%2BP8w6mKXbHYxtkO3fWGP3UwMdBWOo4m-VB0p8_8ap=oA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <YtWDI10ekg6V9wKa@geeks.org> References: <CAKkGsYJKu9V6eveNSgs6783hz7dFnPGnh5C9cWnFqqJCgRzeDA@mail.gmail.com> <YtWDI10ekg6V9wKa@geeks.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 18 Jul 2022 at 16:58, Doug McIntyre <merlyn@geeks.org> wrote: > Besides the other responses already posted. Especially the one about BEs. > > I find them useful to have the separate datasets for purposes of quota, > compression, and shapshotting, which all generally get different setups on > my systems. > > While I'm not sure all the datasets are the way _I_ would have dnoe them, it does > provide at least a common set of reasonable defaults to start with. Thanks Doug, also to Graham, I found that useful. Also I found something useful in the man page for bsdinstall, and took a quick look at its source code.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAKkGsY%2BP8w6mKXbHYxtkO3fWGP3UwMdBWOo4m-VB0p8_8ap=oA>