From owner-freebsd-git@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 30 15:16:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: git@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C25BF87; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 15:16:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C38E2256; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 15:16:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from AlfredMacbookAir.local (c-76-21-10-192.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.21.10.192]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6A7EB1A3C1B; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:16:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53B17F55.3040106@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:16:37 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: git@freebsd.org, uqs@freebsd.org Subject: most efficient means for pushing code from git to FreeBSD svn? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-git@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of git use in the FreeBSD project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 15:16:09 -0000 Hey folks, I am looking for the most efficient means to take code from git and push it into FreeBSD svn. I know for some time there was a git-svn bridge setup for http://github.com/freebsd/freebsd.git, however now when I google around looking for steps on how to use it I get some conflicting information. A few questions: 1) Does the git-svn bridge still exist? 2) Where is the most up to date page on how to do this? 3) Does this work for branches such as 10-stable (or is the git-svn branch only good for -current)? 4) If the git-svn branch is only good for -current, how hard is it to make one for 10-stable? how hard for other branches? 5) Are we still blocked by the requirement for setting "fbsd-keywords"? Thank you, -Alfred