Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2020 09:58:42 +0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?w5Z6a2FuIEtJUklL?= <ozkan.kirik@gmail.com> To: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7cher@yandex.ru> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf (rules and nat) + (ipfw + dummynet) Message-ID: <CAAcX-AEkeVvTaMWMGv0Ef6WVYhUeOs6Sf-P6W0bbj5Q%2BMX98Fw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <893da640-3414-d079-e126-c0f3235eb8e4@yandex.ru> References: <CAOZMOUFfzoVj2mtOHcQRpkrjU%2B02-kik%2BNt7m0_oELUW=H=RXg@mail.gmail.com> <893da640-3414-d079-e126-c0f3235eb8e4@yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello Andrey, Have you started to rewrite dummynet? If yes, I can test and give feedbacks in different scenarios. Regards On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 12:53 PM Andrey V. Elsukov <bu7cher@yandex.ru> wrote: > On 18.08.2019 00:25, Andrew White wrote: > > I also see some work underway to separate dummynet from ipfw, is there > any > > docs for the goals or timelines, will this allow dummynet anchors and use > > of dnctl to use pf with dummynet like in macos ? > > JFYI, > > dummynet uses single exclusive mutex and this kills performance on > modern hardware. If you don't have some patches that are ready for > committing, I think after several months this code will be significantly > rewritten by me and your WIP patches will become stale. > > -- > WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAAcX-AEkeVvTaMWMGv0Ef6WVYhUeOs6Sf-P6W0bbj5Q%2BMX98Fw>