Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 19:26:06 +0300 From: Iasen Kostov <tbyte@OTEL.net> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: arp_rtrequest() panich & patch for comments Message-ID: <417D291E.4060102@OTEL.net> In-Reply-To: <20041025161825.GA33749@shellma.zin.lublin.pl> References: <417D25E2.1080309@OTEL.net> <20041025161825.GA33749@shellma.zin.lublin.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pawel Malachowski wrote: >On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 07:12:18PM +0300, Iasen Kostov wrote: > > > >>This is the segment of code: >> >> if ((rt->rt_flags & RTF_HOST) == 0 && >> SIN(rt_mask(rt))->sin_addr.s_addr != 0xffffffff) >> rt->rt_flags |= RTF_CLONING; >> >> > >BTW, http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/42030 > > > > It's looks the same thing ... I think the creation of virtual devices like tap or tun should be anounced a bit later Same is for destruction may be but little earlier following the logic.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?417D291E.4060102>