From owner-freebsd-sysinstall@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 27 21:06:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sysinstall@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C34106564A for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 21:06:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nwhitehorn@freebsd.org) Received: from argol.doit.wisc.edu (argol.doit.wisc.edu [144.92.197.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD2728FC17 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 21:06:34 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed Received: from avs-daemon.smtpauth3.wiscmail.wisc.edu by smtpauth3.wiscmail.wisc.edu (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.05 32bit (built Jul 30 2009)) id <0LS700B006IY5H00@smtpauth3.wiscmail.wisc.edu> for freebsd-sysinstall@freebsd.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:06:34 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wanderer.tachypleus.net (i3-user-nat.icecube.wisc.edu [128.104.255.12]) by smtpauth3.wiscmail.wisc.edu (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.05 32bit (built Jul 30 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0LS7007KT6IXSX10@smtpauth3.wiscmail.wisc.edu> for freebsd-sysinstall@freebsd.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:06:33 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:06:33 -0500 From: Nathan Whitehorn To: freebsd-sysinstall@freebsd.org Message-id: <4E822CC9.2060604@freebsd.org> X-Spam-Report: AuthenticatedSender=yes, SenderIP=128.104.255.12 X-Spam-PmxInfo: Server=avs-9, Version=5.6.1.2065439, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2011.9.27.200015, SenderIP=128.104.255.12 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110917 Thunderbird/6.0.2 Subject: Removing sysinstall from 10.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-sysinstall@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Sysinstall Work List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 21:06:35 -0000 For the 9.x branch, we're keeping all 3 installers in the base system, but I'd like to remove sysinstall from 10.x now that the releng/9 branch has been made, along with its associated forest of crufty old dependencies (libdisk, libftpio, etc.). Does anyone have strong reasons not to do this? Otherwise I'll consign sysinstall to the attic on Friday 30 Sept. -Nathan