From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 15 09:39:36 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93AAD16A4CE for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2003 09:39:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7857843FDF for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2003 09:39:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from underway@comcast.net) Received: from localhost.localdomain (12-230-74-101.client.attbi.com[12.230.74.101]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with ESMTP id <2003111517393401100qsjuue>; Sat, 15 Nov 2003 17:39:34 +0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAFHbXTG061138 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2003 09:37:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from underway@comcast.net) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id hAFHbSqr061137; Sat, 15 Nov 2003 09:37:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from underway@comcast.net) To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org References: <20031114044623.C119838124@mail.blarg.net> <000801c3ab12$93e5d560$0200000a@io> From: underway@comcast.net (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 09:37:28 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Brad Knowles's message of "Sat, 15 Nov 2003 02:04:32 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Portable Code, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: C/C++ X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 17:39:36 -0000 Brad Knowles writes: > Many folks have asked about the BSD daemon's name. Contrary > to a myth first started by some advertising droid at Walnut > Creek, the daemon's name is NOT Chuck. He is very proud of > the fact that he does not have a name, he is just the BSD > daemon. If you insist on a name, call him beastie. Maybe the British have it right; they say "He is called Chuck", rather than "He is named Chuck". There's no denying that Beastie is called Chuck.