From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jun 15 7:46:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rafiu.psi-domain.co.uk (rafiu.psi-domain.co.uk [212.87.84.199]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A0E937B409 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 07:46:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jamie@psi-domain.co.uk) Received: by rafiu.psi-domain.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4ABDF402E17; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 15:41:57 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: Kernel compilation In-Reply-To: <20010615103820.A94093@mushhaven.net> "from Jamie Norwood at Jun 15, 2001 10:38:20 am" To: Jamie Norwood Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 15:41:57 +0100 (BST) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Reply-To: heckfordj@psi-domain.co.uk X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL88 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Message-Id: <20010615144157.4ABDF402E17@rafiu.psi-domain.co.uk> From: jamie@psi-domain.co.uk (Jamie Heckford) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > may actually exist, thus be installed, and if they have a security problem, > I would be vulnerable with smoething I didn't want in the first place! If kernel modules can only be loaded by root, say linux.ko had a security flaw in it, and you weren't loading it anyway, is it possible for a security vunerbility to be exploited ???? Sorry if im being thick, but I am intrigued. Jamie (H) > > Any suggestions? > > Jamie > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message