From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 24 21:37:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 332F210656E5 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:37:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx22.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8FE78FC21 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:37:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 24443 invoked by uid 399); 24 Mar 2009 21:37:52 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.24?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 24 Mar 2009 21:37:52 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <49C952AE.8080509@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:37:50 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexey Dokuchaev References: <200903240023.n2O0NVBb013624@repoman.freebsd.org> <49C84088.9020505@FreeBSD.org> <20090324021518.GC1292@atarininja.org> <49C84339.60201@FreeBSD.org> <20090324104032.GA47617@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20090324104032.GA47617@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Wesley Shields , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net-im/libpurple Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:38:00 -0000 Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 07:19:37PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: >> Wesley Shields wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 07:08:08PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: >>>> Since silc is off by default (and therefore the package won't change), >>>> was this necessary? >>> There are two viewpoints to this: >>> >>> 1) The option is off by default so the package won't change, and thus >>> PORTREVISION doesn't need to be bumped. >>> >>> 2) Not bumping PORTREVISION may cause the port to misbehave if it's >>> built with old libraries. >> I don't see the logic in this. The port works just fine right now with >> the old libraries. Can you be more specific about the scenario you're >> concerned about? > > Per what I see, shlib version of libsilcclient was bumped during > devel/silc-toolkit update. Since net-im/libpurple explicitly depends on > named library, IFF you have that option enabled. It's off by default. This is one of the main reasons I'd like to propose a replacement for PORTREVISION/PORTEPOCH that can more easily be set within an optional part of the Makefile. Doug