From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org  Sat Apr 23 16:28:29 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76579B1A9C9
 for <freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sat, 23 Apr 2016 16:28:29 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com)
Received: from BLU004-OMC4S5.hotmail.com (blu004-omc4s5.hotmail.com
 [65.55.111.144])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "Microsoft IT SSL SHA2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 362DE1046
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 16:28:28 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com)
Received: from BLU436-SMTP216 ([65.55.111.136]) by BLU004-OMC4S5.hotmail.com
 over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); 
 Sat, 23 Apr 2016 09:28:27 -0700
X-TMN: [BHosc1Xbheu9AlwAZ2Fq/hlxNzAUcf92]
X-Originating-Email: [carmel_ny@outlook.com]
Message-ID: <BLU436-SMTP216A4769A78511EFEBCDFB280600@phx.gbl>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 12:28:24 -0400
From: Carmel <carmel_ny@outlook.com>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Sane way to resolve potential conflicts in the system
In-Reply-To: <CAAdA2WNJ1ru4NunPZ1aZkndXYnK218ojB-3673FDtoBcAH-OJA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAdA2WPZiBYxK9XL_ToAvWtQOiJ0Da7fqVBinyq10+MC10zz6A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOc73CC57yjqteXrZZd+s2Z353r9AycG39mf9f136hGaY=iTzQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAdA2WMJc+t=mw9FZ5ScPBxg0K5t-J7VHozBPBjd_-1TzunCZw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160423162910.7cd2ede2@curlew.lan>
 <BLU436-SMTP13BF30CFA35882760E7E8080600@phx.gbl>
 <CAAdA2WNJ1ru4NunPZ1aZkndXYnK218ojB-3673FDtoBcAH-OJA@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Seibercom NET
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.28; i686-w64-mingw32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Apr 2016 16:28:27.0070 (UTC)
 FILETIME=[29F2B5E0:01D19D7D]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 16:28:29 -0000

On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 19:02:13 +0300, Odhiambo Washington stated:

>I will need to look into this because I use a mixture of portupgrade
>and pkg on this system. Scary?

That is one of the reasons I avoid packages. I have several ports that
require custom configurations, such as Postfix, Dovecot and a few
others. It just doesn't pay for me to mix packages and ports. There
just isn't any upside. The package system is just to juvenile right now.
Until it matures, I will stay with ports.

-- 
Carmel