From owner-cvs-all Thu Jun 7 9:34:54 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from kalaid.f2f.com.ua (kalaid.f2f.com.ua [62.149.0.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3015637B401; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 09:34:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sobomax@mail-in.net) Received: from Mail-In.Net (borey.f2f.com.ua [62.149.0.24]) by kalaid.f2f.com.ua (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f57GZuC66227; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 19:35:56 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from sobomax@mail-in.net) Received: from vega.vega.com ([212.35.189.208]) by Mail-In.Net (8.11.3/8.H.Z) with ESMTP id f57GZ0104405; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 19:35:06 +0300 (EEST) Received: from FreeBSD.org (big_brother.vega.com [192.168.1.1]) by vega.vega.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f57GXO015738; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 19:33:24 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <3B1FACD3.DF31682@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 19:33:23 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Vega International Capital X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en,uk,ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Will Andrews Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/editors/led Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/editors/led/files patch-Makefile.in References: <200106070926.f579QqU16744@freefall.freebsd.org> <20010607071406.Y81224@bohr.physics.purdue.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Will Andrews wrote: > On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 02:26:52AM -0700, Maxim Sobolev (sobomax@FreeBSD.org) wrote: > > Added files: > > editors/led/files patch-Makefile.in > > Log: > > - Pass over maintainership to Jordan DeLong - he is > > author of the led, so would be a best MAINTAINER for it; > > Adding patches when the author could easily integrate them into > his source tree and roll a release at some point is bad form. > > Personally, I'd like to see it made a rule that whenever > reasonably possible, people must get patches merged into the > upstream before a commit is made, rather than after, with some > obvious exceptions (e.g. FreeBSD release close by, author(s) have > shown ignorance in the past, or high demand for patch etc.). I do not see a reason for such a strict requirement here. People want features today, not N days from now (for most packages release rolling is not a very quick process). I think that our repo is able to bear the costs involved, especially considering that ports Attics are being emptied regularly, so there is no cumulative effect. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message