From owner-cvs-all Thu May 17 7: 7:32 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from rapier.smartspace.co.za (rapier.smartspace.co.za [66.8.25.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0EB0037B43C for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 07:07:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nbm@rapier.smartspace.co.za) Received: (qmail 6371 invoked by uid 1001); 17 May 2001 14:07:08 -0000 Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 16:07:08 +0200 From: Neil Blakey-Milner To: Brian Somers Cc: Ying-Chieh Liao , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/socks5 Makefile pkg-plist Message-ID: <20010517160707.A5538@rapier.smartspace.co.za> References: <200105170926.f4H9Qab60547@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200105170926.f4H9Qab60547@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org>; from brian@Awfulhak.org on Thu, May 17, 2001 at 10:26:36AM +0100 Organization: Building Intelligence X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE i386 X-URL: http://rucus.ru.ac.za/~nbm/ Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu 2001-05-17 (10:26), Brian Somers wrote: > Is a PORTREVISION bump necessary for doc/example fixes ? > > To me, a PORTVERSION change means I need to rebuild & reinstall the Strictly, it should occur whenever the generated package is different in any way. Theoretically we should also bump it if something like a static archive that it relies upon gets changed, and things like that. If done properly, it can help maintain as high a standard as Debian usually enjoys in binary package dependencies and upgrades. Neil -- Neil Blakey-Milner nbm@mithrandr.moria.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message