From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 30 23:21:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4783C16A41F for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 23:21:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsdlists@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D60F043D45 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 23:21:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsdlists@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z6so848190nzd for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 16:21:30 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IeScw9SjqafBxHWrINqPwjPM0x+dm1o4XbASoVTlf72NSD/ErBYNF/VLbCuvQoJUXA8CddLjnE+JgHA/AFxIPsKKN+fr7pyLo/cJsClUv1qo7gCaS6K+iTK/o/60t2wdnJcglTHdcDOMNsNI+3q8f+kpVpIimgAfMXEJKQewsao= Received: by 10.36.221.40 with SMTP id t40mr2146208nzg; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 16:14:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.221.21 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 16:14:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <54db43990508301614579aa094@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 19:14:22 -0400 From: Bob Johnson To: Brian McCann In-Reply-To: <2b5f066d05083012413a8a8730@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <2b5f066d05083012413a8a8730@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Snapshots X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 23:21:31 -0000 On 8/30/05, Brian McCann wrote: > Hi all...I'm having a problem using snapshots...which I discovered > when I tried a system backup using dump. I've got a 283Gb partition, > and the system was trying to create the snapshot for > 12 hours. I'm > on 5.4-RELEASE. Should this be taking this long? My gut tells me > no...cause it'd be foolish if it did. Any ideas/suggestions? >=20 No, it shouldn't. It appears that there is some problem with the snapshot process on large filesystems in 5.4-RELEASE and perhaps others, but I don't know how aggressively it is being investigated, or whether a solution has already been found. There have been several posts about this in the past month or two, if you search the archives you might find better information about it. I remember there was conjecture about the possible cause (e.g. insufficient temporary storage space for the inode list), but I don't remember if this led to a workable solution. - Bob